<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: 5 Free Keyword Research Tools for Better SEO Results	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://b2bwritersinternational.com/2022/01/5-free-keyword-research-tools-for-better-seo-results/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://b2bwritersinternational.com/2022/01/5-free-keyword-research-tools-for-better-seo-results/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 01 Dec 2022 19:52:02 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=6.9.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Marie D Amico		</title>
		<link>https://b2bwritersinternational.com/2022/01/5-free-keyword-research-tools-for-better-seo-results/#comment-1449</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Marie D Amico]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 May 2022 21:33:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://www.b2bwritingsuccess.com/?p=45338#comment-1449</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;m confused because you are not taking keyword difficulty into account. I used Google autocomplete and Related Searches to find KWs for a client. When I took the KWs over to Ahrefs to get more granular they all had difficulty scores in the 70s and 80s and the sites that were ranking also were in that neighborhood. I know that the next step is to look in the SERPs for sites that are ranking that have lower domain ratings but I did not find any. My client is a small site and just starting to SEO so low DR and few links so what is your advice on that? Also, I do have Ahrefs so that is going to allow me to go deeper but in your article the presumption is the writer does not have that tool so they are left with a bunch of what seemingly  are excellent KWs but in fact are going to be impossible to rank for. Thanks, Marie]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m confused because you are not taking keyword difficulty into account. I used Google autocomplete and Related Searches to find KWs for a client. When I took the KWs over to Ahrefs to get more granular they all had difficulty scores in the 70s and 80s and the sites that were ranking also were in that neighborhood. I know that the next step is to look in the SERPs for sites that are ranking that have lower domain ratings but I did not find any. My client is a small site and just starting to SEO so low DR and few links so what is your advice on that? Also, I do have Ahrefs so that is going to allow me to go deeper but in your article the presumption is the writer does not have that tool so they are left with a bunch of what seemingly  are excellent KWs but in fact are going to be impossible to rank for. Thanks, Marie</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
